The generic playbook is on this page. The personalized fix is in the 17-metric audit.
Most Tinder users have 3 to 5 fixable issues across their photos and do not know which ones. The audit identifies them in writing.
17 metrics · Per-photo scoring · 5-page PDF · 30-day plan
$29 dating audit · 7-day refund · Free face score available
Tinder rewards a small number of decisions disproportionately. The lead photo carries the bulk of the first-tap signal; everything else in the lineup is supporting evidence. A strong lead with a weak lineup converts; a weak lead with a strong lineup mostly does not, because most viewers never see past the lead.
The four decisions that move the needle most: which photo is your lead, whether your eyes are visible in the lead, whether the lead shows a real Duchenne smile (AU6 plus AU12, where the eye crinkle is genuine) rather than a forced lip smile, and whether the lineup includes at least one full-body photo. About 70 percent of Tinder profiles get at least one of these wrong, usually the lead itself.
The rest of the lineup matters less than people think. Variety helps a little (one full-body, one activity, one social, the rest portraits). Diminishing returns set in around six photos. The marginal value of the seventh and eighth photo is real but small; the marginal cost of a weak ninth photo dragging the average can be larger than the lift from one more decent photo.
No sunglasses, no hat brim shadowing the eyes. The eye region is the highest-weighted area in the scoring stack. Hiding it on the photo most viewers see first is the single most expensive unforced error.
No group shot as the lead. The viewer cannot identify you before they swipe. One group photo deeper in the lineup is fine; the lead must be unambiguous.
A Duchenne smile (eye crinkle plus genuine lip movement) outperforms a forced lip smile in every published preference dataset. Most users under-use the eye crinkle even when the lip smile is genuine.
Window light, golden hour, or a softbox at 45 degrees. Avoid overhead fluorescent (under-eye shadows), direct flash (flattens texture), and harsh midday sun (raccoon-eye shadows).
One full-body photo answers the height-and-build question viewers have. Without it, viewers assume the worst. Two body shots is too many.
One photo of you doing something. It should be a photo where you are clearly the subject, not a generic landscape where you are incidental.
Light color correction and exposure adjustment are fine. Beauty filters that flatten skin texture are not. The filter is doing visible work against the score whenever a viewer can tell.
The bait-and-switch read is the fastest way to a left swipe. Recent photos always.
Most people know the generic playbook. They have read the same five articles you have read. What they do not know is which specific photo in their lineup is the drag, whether their lead is their strongest photo, and which two or three fixes would move their specific match rate.
That gap is what the audit closes. Upload up to ten photos, get every photo scored on 17 metrics, see which photo is the actual strongest, and read a personalized 5-page PDF with a 30-day reshoot plan. The audit pays for itself if it identifies one fix that moves your match rate even modestly. For most users, it identifies three to five.
Generic tips are on this page. The personalized fix is in the audit.
The $29 dating audit scores up to 10 photos on 17 metrics, picks your strongest lead, identifies which photos to delete, and writes a 5-page personalized PDF with a 30-day plan.
30 seconds. 17 metrics. 5-page personalized PDF. 7-day refund.
$29 dating audit · Photos auto-deleted · 30-day plan
All free. All private. All instant.
Is your smile genuine or forced?
How close are your proportions to φ?
AI attractiveness analysis
Rate my face 1–10
How attractive am I?
How symmetrical is your face?
Which photo gets more matches?
Best photo for LinkedIn
Your glow-up score