Looksmaxxing Test
17 metrics · AI glow-up plan
Tests
Smile Analyzer
Genuine vs fake smile · instant AI read
Compare Photos
Which photo gets more matches?
Golden Ratio Test
Facial proportions vs ideal
Face Metrics
measured in the looksmaxxing test
Explore
Your appearance shapes first impressions, career opportunities, and dating success. AI maps 17 facial dimensions and shows exactly what to improve — free, instant, private.
No signup · Photos never leave your device · 7-day refund on premium
Found out my canthal tilt is negative 2° — explains so much about my eye shape
Scored 91 on symmetry but my jawline wrecked my overall. At least I know what to fix
Already knew I had hunter eyes — now I have the data to prove it. +6° canthal tilt
Fixed my posture after seeing my score. 4 months later everything looks sharper
My FWHR is 1.93 — apparently elite tier. Never thought to measure that before
Jawline 43/100 hit different but at least I know exactly what to fix now
Tried 3 other tools — this is the only one that gives real measurements, not just vibes
Sent this to my gym bros. Now everyone is comparing FWHR scores and mewing properly
Score went from 67 to 79 after a cut + mewing for 3 months. Progress tracking is real
Overall 78 but eye metrics were 94. Hunter eyes confirmed. Worth knowing the breakdown
Symmetry score opened my eyes — literally. Started sleeping differently and it helped
The gonial angle measurement told me more than any forum post ever could
Found out my canthal tilt is negative 2° — explains so much about my eye shape
Scored 91 on symmetry but my jawline wrecked my overall. At least I know what to fix
Already knew I had hunter eyes — now I have the data to prove it. +6° canthal tilt
Fixed my posture after seeing my score. 4 months later everything looks sharper
My FWHR is 1.93 — apparently elite tier. Never thought to measure that before
Jawline 43/100 hit different but at least I know exactly what to fix now
Tried 3 other tools — this is the only one that gives real measurements, not just vibes
Sent this to my gym bros. Now everyone is comparing FWHR scores and mewing properly
Score went from 67 to 79 after a cut + mewing for 3 months. Progress tracking is real
Overall 78 but eye metrics were 94. Hunter eyes confirmed. Worth knowing the breakdown
Symmetry score opened my eyes — literally. Started sleeping differently and it helped
The gonial angle measurement told me more than any forum post ever could
Found out my canthal tilt is negative 2° — explains so much about my eye shape
Scored 91 on symmetry but my jawline wrecked my overall. At least I know what to fix
Already knew I had hunter eyes — now I have the data to prove it. +6° canthal tilt
Fixed my posture after seeing my score. 4 months later everything looks sharper
My FWHR is 1.93 — apparently elite tier. Never thought to measure that before
Jawline 43/100 hit different but at least I know exactly what to fix now
Tried 3 other tools — this is the only one that gives real measurements, not just vibes
Sent this to my gym bros. Now everyone is comparing FWHR scores and mewing properly
Score went from 67 to 79 after a cut + mewing for 3 months. Progress tracking is real
Overall 78 but eye metrics were 94. Hunter eyes confirmed. Worth knowing the breakdown
Symmetry score opened my eyes — literally. Started sleeping differently and it helped
The gonial angle measurement told me more than any forum post ever could
Get your score in 10 seconds
For all genders · Front-facing photo · Good lighting · 100% private
🔒 Your photo is never uploaded, stored, or shared — analysis runs entirely on your device
How it works
Upload
Take a selfie or upload a front-facing photo
AI Analysis
68 landmarks mapped, 17 metrics computed in 10 seconds
Your Report
Score, percentile, strengths, and a fix plan
Facial Mapping
Your Metric Visualization
Tap a metric to isolate · Screenshot to share
Above Avg
Male, 28
Above Avg
Female, 25
Average
Male, 32
Premium Feature
AI Glow-Up Preview
See your optimized self — targeting your 3 weakest metrics
AI generates an enhanced version of your actual photo — improved skin clarity, lighting, and features based on your lowest metrics. Included in the premium report.
Your Report
Overall Score
Strengths
Facial Symmetry
Eye Spacing
Lip Ratio
Level Up
Jawline Angle
Midface Ratio
Nose Proportion
See what each improvement looks like on you
New hairstyle
Facial hair
Glasses style
Available in the full report
Fully Private
Photos never leave your phone
5-Second Results
AI analysis in real-time
17 Metrics
Real facial geometry math
Looksmaxxing is the practice of systematically improving your physical appearance through evidence-based methods. It originated in online self-improvement communities and has gone mainstream on TikTok, Reddit, and YouTube as people realize that small, consistent changes to grooming, skincare, fitness, and photo presentation have outsized effects on first impressions.
The looksmaxxing approach is divided into two categories. Softmaxxing includes non-invasive improvements like skincare routines, hairstyle optimization, eyebrow grooming, fitness, posture correction, and learning to photograph well. Hardmaxxing involves surgical or medical procedures. This looksmaxxing test focuses entirely on softmaxxing — actionable, safe improvements anyone can make.
The goal of this test isn't to rate your attractiveness — no AI can do that meaningfully. Instead, it gives you objective facial measurements compared to population averages, then tells you what you can actually improve through grooming, fitness, and photo technique.
Compares left and right sides of your face across jawline, eyes, brows, and mouth. Population average is ~85%. Highly symmetric faces score 92%+.
The angle of your eye corners. Positive (upward) tilt at the outer corners creates the "hunter eyes" look associated with alertness and attractiveness. Ideal canthal tilt: 4-7°.
How wide your face is relative to midface height. FWHR ratios of 1.8-2.0 are linked with perceived dominance and attractiveness in peer-reviewed research.
Whether your forehead, midface, and lower face are proportionally equal. The classical ideal is equal thirds (33/33/33).
The distance between your eyes relative to eye width. The classical ideal is exactly one eye-width between the eyes (ratio of 1.0).
The angle of your jaw from chin to jaw corner. Defined, angular jaws typically measure 45-55°. One of the most important looksmaxxing metrics for men.
Nose width as a percentage of total face width. The classical ideal is 22-26%.
The balance between upper and lower lip fullness. A slightly fuller lower lip (ratio of 0.5-0.8) is considered ideal.
The compactness of your midface region. A shorter midface (0.42-0.48) is associated with youthful, attractive proportions.
Eye width-to-height ratio. More elongated, narrow eyes (2.8-3.5) are the "hunter eye" shape. This is one of the most popular metrics in looksmaxxing communities.
Most facial metrics are influenced by both genetics and controllable factors. Here are the highest-ROI softmaxxing improvements:
Getting to 12-15% body fat (men) or 18-22% (women) reveals jawline definition, cheekbone structure, and improves nearly every facial metric. This is the single most impactful softmaxxing change.
The highest-ROI grooming change. Clean, shaped brows frame the eye area, can shift perceived canthal tilt, and improve facial symmetry in photos. Directly impacts 3 metrics.
A simple routine (cleanser, moisturizer, SPF) improves skin texture and clarity, which affects how every feature photographs. Visible results in 4-8 weeks.
Camera angle, lighting, and expression have massive effects. Natural light from the side, camera at eye level, and a genuine smile can shift your perceived looksmax score by 10-20 points.
The right hairstyle can rebalance facial proportions — adding width to a narrow face (improving FWHR), covering a high forehead, or framing the eye area differently.
Forward head posture compresses the jawline and creates a double chin effect. Good posture lengthens the neck and defines the jaw angle.
Free · 10 seconds · No signup
17 facial metrics. AI-measured. Instant results.
100% private · Photos never leave your device · 7-day refund on premium
No signup · Free to try · Full report $12.99 one-time
Improve your results
17-metric AI face analysis with glow-up plan — free for your readers — one line of code, no API key, no server cost.
<iframe src="https://realsmile.online/embed/looksmax" width="380" height="420" style="border:none;border-radius:16px;" ></iframe>
Based on common looksmax test results — these move the needle most.
Collagen Peptides Powder (9.33oz)
$21.99Vital Proteins
★ 4.6(98k reviews)Collagen supplementation increases skin elasticity and reduces sagging around the jawline and under the eyes. Multiple RCTs show measurable improvement in 4–8 weeks.
Results in 4-8 weeksESARORA Ice Roller for Face & Eye
$13.99ESARORA
★ 4.5(42k reviews)Reduces under-eye and facial puffiness within minutes — sharpens eye shape and jawline for photos.
Results in immediateTinkle Dermaplaning Tool 6ct
$6.99Tinkle
★ 4.6(138k reviews)The tail of the brow anchors the perceived eye tilt angle. Angling the outer tail upward creates a 1–3° positive canthal tilt illusion — immediate effect.
Results in immediateCurated based on facial analysis data. No photos collected. Affiliate links — we earn a small commission at no extra cost to you.
See all →Facial analysis tools like this one are built on decades of peer-reviewed research in facial geometry, evolutionary psychology, and computer vision. The metrics measured here aren't arbitrary — each one has an established research foundation linking it to perceived attractiveness, health signaling, or social dominance perception.
Facial Width-to-Height Ratio (FWHR) was identified as a predictor of perceived dominance in a 2008 study by Carré and McCormick in the Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Higher FWHR correlates with perceived assertiveness and leadership presence. Separately, a 2010 study found FWHR also predicts financial performance in CEOs.
Canthal tilt — the angle of the outer corners of the eyes relative to the inner corners — emerged as a significant attractiveness predictor in studies analyzing what distinguishes conventionally attractive faces. A positive canthal tilt (outer corners higher than inner) correlates strongly with ratings of attractiveness in both men and women.
Facial symmetry has been linked to developmental stability and genetic health since the 1990s. Research by Randy Thornhill and Steven Gangestad found that more symmetrical individuals are rated as more attractive and report more dating and relationship success on average. The effect is real but modest — asymmetry alone doesn't determine attractiveness.
Jawline definition (measured via jaw angle and chin projection) signals hormonal health — specifically testosterone exposure. A well-defined jaw is consistently rated as masculine and attractive in male faces, and as strong and confident in female faces. This measurement differs from most online “jaw tests” in that it uses actual geometric angles rather than subjective ratings.
Left-to-right balance across all major features. Measured as a percentage deviation — 100% is perfect symmetry, which no face actually achieves.
The angle of the outer eye corners relative to the inner corners. Positive = outer higher than inner (associated with attractiveness). Measured in degrees.
Facial width-to-height ratio. Width measured at cheekbones, height from upper lip to brow. Higher values correlate with perceived dominance.
The angle of the jaw from ear to chin. A sharper angle indicates a more defined jawline; a wider angle indicates a softer, rounder jaw shape.
Composite score based on canthal tilt, eyelid exposure (how much of the iris is visible), and brow position. High scores = hooded, almond-shaped eyes.
Division of the face into three equal horizontal thirds (forehead, midface, lower face). Ideal balance is roughly 33%/33%/33%.
The height of the midface (brow to upper lip) relative to total face height. Shorter midfaces are generally rated as more attractive.
Distance between eyes as a fraction of face width. Ideal eye spacing follows the golden ratio principle — each gap equals one eye width.
Nose width relative to face width and nose length relative to midface height. Both contribute to perceived facial harmony.
Upper-to-lower lip thickness ratio. Most attractiveness research points to a ratio of approximately 1:1.6, with a fuller lower lip.
The curvature ratio of the brow relative to its width. A moderate arch is associated with an alert, expressive appearance. Measured as a curvature ratio.
Length of the philtrum (the groove between nose and upper lip) as a fraction of the lower face. Shorter philtrums are generally rated as more attractive.
Chin height as a fraction of the lower third of the face. Balanced chin proportion contributes to overall facial harmony and profile aesthetics.
The vertical distance between the brow and the upper eyelid, measured as a ratio. Closer brow-eye distance is associated with a more intense, defined eye area.
Ratio of jaw width to chin width. A higher taper indicates a more V-shaped jawline — tapered toward the chin — which is a common looksmaxxing goal.
Composite score comparing multiple facial proportions against the golden ratio (1.618). Higher scores indicate more mathematically harmonious facial proportions overall.
How symmetrically the eye sockets are angled — comparing the orbital tilt of the left and right eye. High asymmetry here is one of the most noticeable facial imbalances.
Facial geometry is one component of appearance — and appearance is one component of attractiveness. This test measures structural facial metrics objectively. It does not measure expression quality (see our Smile Analyzer), skin quality, grooming, style, body language, voice, personality, or any of the dozens of other factors that determine how attractive someone actually is in person or in photos.
Many people with “below average” scores on individual metrics are considered highly attractive by others. Many people with high scores are not. The research correlations are real but modest — treat this as useful self-knowledge, not a verdict.
The most actionable insights from this test are usually the ones that point to improvable factors: expression quality, photo lighting, posture, and — for longer-term goals — areas where lifestyle changes like training, sleep, and skincare can make meaningful differences.