Compare your jawline to celebrity score patterns. Gonial angle, bigonial width, jaw ratio. Score-only output, no photos.
Free. 100 percent private. Your photo never leaves the browser.
17 metrics · NIH-cited landmarks · Free · No signup
Free comparison · $14.99 unlocks full 17-metric report
The perception of a strong jaw is mostly the combination of three measurements: gonial angle (the angle where the mandible meets the ascending ramus), bigonial width (the horizontal distance across the jaw at its widest point), and the jaw-to-chin ratio. Henry Cavill has been measured in published photographic analyses at a gonial angle in the 118 to 122 degree range with a moderate bigonial width and a centered, projected chin. Brad Pitt sits in a similar gonial range but with a narrower bigonial measurement. Cristiano Ronaldo sits slightly sharper, in the 115 to 119 degree range, with a wider lower face overall.
None of these celebrities sit at the geometric extreme. The published face-preference research (Said and Todorov 2011 on perceived attractiveness) repeatedly shows that the perceived-attractive jawline sits in a moderate band, not at the lowest possible gonial angle. A very sharp jaw with a high bigonial width registers as masculine but not necessarily as more attractive than a moderate-band jaw with proportional bigonial measurement. Margot Robbie's jaw sits in the softer 128 to 132 degree range typical of perceived-attractive female-coded faces.
This page returns your three jaw measurements and the closest archetype in the celebrity set by score pattern. The result is a numeric comparison, not a photo. The score pattern is the real signal; the celebrity name is the shorthand.
Measured from the landmark at the jaw corner, with the mandibular line below and the ramus line above. Published perceived-attractive ranges sit broadly in the 115 to 135 degree band depending on sex coding.
Horizontal distance between the two gonial landmarks. Normalized to face width so the metric is scale-invariant. Wide bigonial measurements register as masculine; narrower ones as feminine.
Ratio of the bigonial width to the chin width at the symphysis. Tapered ratios read as more feminine; rectangular ratios as more masculine.
Lower-face height (subnasale to menton) as a fraction of total facial height. Affects how the jaw is perceived even when the jaw measurements themselves are average.
Angle of the mandibular line relative to the horizontal. Flat planes register as masculine; steeper planes as feminine. Carried as descriptive context in the report.
Not a metric in the composite; flagged in the report as an interpretation note. Higher submental fat masks the underlying jaw geometry in photos. Two faces with the same gonial angle can present very differently.
A jaw score in the bottom quartile usually points at three things in order: body fat masking the underlying bone (most movable), posture compressing the lower face in profile shots (second most movable), and the underlying bone itself (least movable). The score reports the measurement; the lever you can actually move is the first two.
A jaw score in the top quartile is a structural asset to lean into in photography and styling. Slightly under-lit profile shots show the jaw line at its sharpest. The score will tell you which lighting and angle conditions actually surface your jaw rather than hide it.
Jaw is one metric. The other 16 are the story.
The $14.99 Looksmax Report scores all 17 metrics, including the jaw stack plus everything else your face is doing. Written breakdown plus targeted plan.
Free, instant, private. Closest celebrity jaw archetype by score pattern. No photos returned.
17 metrics · NIH-cited landmarks · Photos auto-deleted
All free. All private. All instant.
Is your smile genuine or forced?
How close are your proportions to φ?
AI attractiveness analysis
Rate my face 1–10
How attractive am I?
How symmetrical is your face?
Which photo gets more matches?
Best photo for LinkedIn
Your glow-up score