Looksmaxxing Test

Popular

AI score across 10 metrics · glow-up plan · $4.99

Face Analysis

Explore

Unlock your full report

All 10 metrics + personalized plan · One-time $4.99

Start Free Analysis →
Comparison3 min read

RealSmile vs Anaface: Golden Ratio vs AI Facial Metrics

Anaface scores your facial proportions against the golden ratio. RealSmile measures 10 AI-detected facial metrics backed by peer-reviewed research. Here's the difference.

Bottom line up front

Anaface's golden ratio approach is scientifically contested — studies show phi-based facial attractiveness has weak correlation with actual attractiveness ratings. RealSmile uses metrics that have stronger evidence: symmetry, canthal tilt, FWHR, and jawline angle.

FeatureRealSmileAnaface
Scoring methodologyAI landmark detection — 10 geometric metricsGolden ratio (phi = 1.618) proportion scoring
Metrics measuredSymmetry, canthal tilt, FWHR, jawline angle, hunter eyes, and 5 moreFacial proportions vs golden ratio only
PrivacyPhotos never uploaded — runs in your browserPhoto uploaded to server
Actionable adviceRanked glow-up plan per metricNone — score only
CostFree scan, $4.99 full reportFree
Speed~10 seconds~10 seconds
Accuracy basisPeer-reviewed facial geometry researchGolden ratio (contested correlation with attractiveness)

Does the golden ratio actually predict attractiveness?

The golden ratio (phi = 1.618) has been proposed as a standard of facial beauty since ancient Greece. Anaface applies this by measuring whether facial proportions match phi. The problem: modern peer-reviewed research shows weak and inconsistent correlation between golden ratio facial proportions and actual attractiveness ratings. A 2015 study in PLOS ONE found that faces rated highly attractive often deviate significantly from phi.

RealSmile uses metrics with stronger evidence: bilateral facial symmetry (linked to developmental stability since Thornhill & Gangestad 1993), canthal tilt (consistently rated attractive in multiple cross-cultural studies), FWHR (linked to testosterone and dominance perception), and jawline angle (signals hormonal health). These metrics have more empirical support than golden ratio scoring.

That said — if you want golden ratio analysis specifically, RealSmile also has a dedicated Golden Ratio Test that maps 68 facial landmarks against phi across multiple facial zones.

Which should you use?

For a broader, evidence-based facial analysis across 10 metrics — use RealSmile's looksmaxxing test. For specifically golden ratio scoring — RealSmile's own golden ratio test covers this more thoroughly than Anaface while also giving improvement context.

Free · 10 seconds · No signup

Try RealSmile free

10 facial metrics including golden ratio, symmetry, canthal tilt, and more.

Get My Free Score →