Face Yoga vs Mewing · Evidence Comparison

Face yoga vs mewing

RealSmile Research Team · Facial Analysis Specialists
Updated May 16, 2026
Based on 3 peer-reviewed sources
→ See our methodology

Face yoga has one published RCT (Sinclair 2018). Mewing has none in adults. What each technique actually moves, and how to measure before you commit to either.

Baseline first. Run one technique for 60 days. Rescan. If you skip the baseline you will never know whether anything moved.

17 metrics · Free · No signup

Free score · $14.99 unlocks the full 17-metric written breakdown

The actual research, side by side

Face yoga. Alam, Walter, Geisler, et al, JAMA Dermatology 2018. 27 women aged 40 to 65 completed a 20-week protocol of 32 different facial exercises, 30 minutes per day for the first 8 weeks then alternating days for weeks 9 through 20. Two blinded dermatologists rated standardized photos. Upper cheek fullness and lower cheek fullness both improved significantly versus baseline (mean upper cheek score 1.35 to 1.81 on a 1 to 6 scale, p less than 0.001). The sample is small and the population is narrow, but the methodology is solid and the effect was visible to blinded raters.

Mewing. No published RCT in adults. The closest peer-reviewed work is orthotropics research on growing children (changes in palatal width and dental arch development during the growth window), which is a different intervention applied during a developmental window that closes in adolescence. The adult-mewing evidence is anecdote and before-and-after photo collections, none of which control for camera, lighting, posture, body composition, or time elapsed.

The honest read: face yoga has weak but real evidence for cheek fullness in aging women. Mewing has no comparable evidence for bony change in adults. Both techniques may still produce soft-tissue and posture effects that read as visible change in photos. The scan exists to tell you which.

What each technique can plausibly move

Face yoga: upper cheek fullness

Sinclair 2018 RCT showed measurable improvement in 20 weeks. Mechanism is modest zygomaticus and orbicularis hypertrophy. Captured by the cheekbone projection metric and the midface ratio metric.

Face yoga: lower cheek fullness

Same RCT showed improvement in the lower cheek. Mechanism is masseter and platysma toning. Captured by the jawline definition metric in straight-on photos.

Mewing: submental projection

Most reliably documented soft-tissue effect in adults. The submental area tightens within weeks under consistent tongue posture. Captured by the submental projection metric in profile photos.

Mewing: resting head posture

Improved chin-tucked neutral position lengthens the apparent neck and crowds the jawline. Captured by the neck angle metric in profile photos.

Neither: structural bone change

No published adult RCT supports skeletal change from either technique. Mandibular plane angle, midface ratio, and cheekbone projection are largely fixed in adults outside of orthognathic surgery.

Neither: dental occlusion

Mewing and face yoga do not reliably correct overbites, underbites, or crossbites in adults. Those need orthodontic intervention.

👁️

Most correlated metric

Next: Canthal Tilt Test

See if you have the eye angle associated with high attractiveness ratings.

Why baseline first

Most people who claim either technique changed their face are comparing photos taken under different lighting conditions, at different body fat percentages, with different cameras, after months of unrelated soft-tissue changes (skin texture improvement, posture work, sleep quality). The metric deltas in the scan separate real intervention effect from confounds.

Capture the same shoot on day zero (straight-on plus left profile, plain background, flat daylight, neutral expression) and re-run at day 30, day 60, and day 90. If the target metric moved more than 3 percentile points and other unrelated metrics did not, the change is plausibly attributable to the intervention. If everything moved together, you are looking at a body composition or photo confound.

Honest limits

Face yoga vs mewing FAQ

Which one actually has research behind it?+
Face yoga has one published randomized controlled trial: Alam, Walter, Geisler, et al, JAMA Dermatology 2018, "Association of Facial Exercise With the Appearance of Aging." 27 middle-aged women, 20 weeks of daily 30-minute face yoga, blinded dermatologist raters scored upper cheek and lower cheek fullness as significantly improved versus baseline. Sample size is small and the population is narrow (middle-aged women, aging concern, not jaw-definition concern), so the result generalizes weakly. Mewing has no published RCT in adults. The closest mewing-adjacent literature is in growing children on orthotropics, which is a different intervention applied at a different developmental window.
Does that mean face yoga is better than mewing?+
For aging-related cheek and midface fullness in middle-aged women, the evidence leans yes. For jaw definition and lower-third structural change in adult men, neither technique has supporting evidence. Most claims people make for either technique sit outside the populations the actual research covers.
What does face yoga actually do?+
Face yoga is a category of facial exercise routines that target the major facial muscle groups (orbicularis oculi, zygomaticus, masseter, platysma, frontalis) through repeated controlled contractions. The Sinclair 2018 RCT protocol used 32 different exercises rotated across 20 weeks, 30 minutes per day. The mechanism appears to be modest muscle hypertrophy and improved lymphatic drainage, both of which can shift cheek fullness and midface contour over months.
What does mewing actually do?+
Mewing is the practice of resting the entire tongue against the roof of the mouth with the lips sealed and teeth lightly touching. Proponents claim long-term tongue posture can subtly influence midface and jaw development. The most reliable documented effect in adults is soft-tissue tightening under the chin (submental projection) and improved resting head posture, both of which can read as a sharper jawline in photos without underlying bony change.
Can I do both?+
Yes. The techniques operate on different mechanisms (muscle hypertrophy vs resting posture) and do not interfere with each other. The honest caveat is that running two interventions in parallel makes attribution harder; you will not know which is moving your metrics. If you want clean attribution, baseline first, run one technique for 60 days, rescan, then layer the second.
How do I baseline before starting either?+
Take a neutral straight-on photo and a left-profile photo against a plain wall in flat daylight. Run both through the free 17-metric scan to capture mandibular plane angle, lower-third proportion, midface ratio, jawline definition, cheekbone projection, and submental projection. Save the report. Re-run the same shoot at day 30, day 60, and day 90. The metric deltas tell you whether the intervention is actually moving anything visible, separated from the placebo of staring at your face in the mirror every day.
What does the free score vs the $14.99 report give me?+
Free: composite plus two strongest and two weakest of the 17 metrics. The $14.99 Looksmax Report breaks every metric into percentile bands, tags structural vs soft-tissue, and writes a prioritized intervention plan ordered by expected impact. Five rescan slots included so you can run the day-0, day-30, day-60, and day-90 timeline with one purchase.

Baseline before you start. Rescan day 30, 60, 90. Real deltas only.

Capture all 17 metrics with the written breakdown.

The $14.99 Looksmax Report ranks every metric, identifies the two dragging your composite, and prescribes a soft-tissue plan ordered by expected impact. Five rescan slots included.

Baseline before face yoga or mewing

Free, instant, private. 17 metrics with day-zero numbers you can compare against in 90 days.

17 metrics · Photos auto-deleted · Rescan as often as you want

Related Tools

Improve your results

Try our other tools

All free. All private. All instant.

Related on RealSmile

Hand-picked from 90+ tests, guides, and audits.