Photo technique alone moves the composite by a median 9 percentile points between your worst self-shot and your best deliberate shot. Lighting, lens, angle, posture, expression.
Plus a $29 photo audit: human review of 3 to 5 photos with annotated callouts and reshoot prescriptions.
$29 photo audit · 48-hour turnaround · Or start with the free scan
$29 audit · or start with the free scan to see which weak metric to fix
Photo presentation has five controllable inputs: lighting, lens, angle, posture, expression. Each one independently shifts how a face reads to the observer. Compounded, the delta between your worst self-shot and a deliberately controlled shot averages 9 percentile points on the 17-metric composite, with the 90th percentile delta reaching 15 to 18 points. Nothing about the underlying face moves. The composite moves because the inputs to each metric are cleaner.
Most amateur dating-profile photos get every input wrong simultaneously: phone selfie wide-angle lens, harsh overhead light, chin-up posture, tense resting expression, full straight-on angle with no head turn. The fix is not better skin or a sharper jaw; it is rotating each input one click toward neutral. The cumulative effect is large.
Phone selfie wide-angle (28mm equivalent) distorts proportions and exaggerates the nose. Switch to rear camera at arm's length, or 1x to 2x zoom in selfie mode. Average composite shift: 5 to 7 percentile points.
Flat north-facing daylight at 45 degrees beats every other condition. Avoid overhead noon sun (under-eye shadow), indoor incandescent (skin tone distortion), and phone flash (flattens dimensionality). Average composite shift: 4 to 6 points.
Chin-tucked neutral lengthens the apparent neck and sharpens the jawline. Chin-up shortens the neck and crowds the lower face. Shoulders rolled slightly back open the chest and lift the head. Average composite shift: 3 to 5 points.
Three-quarter angle (head turned 15 to 30 degrees off center) flatters most faces by showing jaw and cheekbone definition. Pure straight-on works for highly symmetric faces. Pure profile reveals harder-to-control metrics. Average shift: 2 to 4 points.
Resting micro-smile (mouth corners lifted 2mm) reads warmer than fully neutral without slipping into forced grin. Eye smile (slight squint plus mouth lift) registers as genuine in perception studies. Average shift: 2 to 4 points.
Crop tight enough to fill the frame but loose enough to show shoulders. Avoid centering exactly; rule-of-thirds offset reads more deliberate. Smaller marginal effect than the other four.
Most people read photo-tip articles, rotate one or two inputs, and miss the others. The composite moves a little. The audit exists because a human reviewer can spot all five inputs at once on your specific face, weigh which two are doing the most damage in your specific lineup, and write a reshoot prescription that targets those two first.
The $29 audit is a temp-priced elasticity test from the $49 standard tier. At $29 the audit is a 13x return on cost versus the average composite shift it produces, which is why it converts at the rate it does. Pricing may revert to $49 without notice.
9-point median composite shift between worst and best shot of the same face.
The $29 photo audit returns annotated callouts on each image and a written reshoot prescription. 48-hour turnaround. Temp-priced from $49 standard.
Human review of 3 to 5 photos with annotated callouts and reshoot prescriptions. 48-hour turnaround.
$29 photo audit · Temp-priced from $49 standard · Photos auto-deleted after delivery
All free. All private. All instant.
Is your smile genuine or forced?
How close are your proportions to φ?
AI attractiveness analysis
Rate my face 1–10
How attractive am I?
How symmetrical is your face?
Which photo gets more matches?
Best photo for LinkedIn
Your glow-up score
Hand-picked from 90+ tests, guides, and audits.
Does lifting actually improve facial attractiveness?
LifestyleHow lifting changes your face read
LifestyleMasseter work, mastic gum, what to skip
LifestyleFoods that reduce face fat + skin inflammation
LooksmaxHow close are you to phi (1.618)?
LooksmaxHow presentation multiplies your baseline