Looksmaxxing Test
17 metrics · AI glow-up plan
Tests
Smile Analyzer
Genuine vs fake smile · instant AI read
Compare Photos
Which photo gets more matches?
Golden Ratio Test
Facial proportions vs ideal
Face Metrics
measured in the looksmaxxing test
Explore
Measurements Explained
The 17-metric video series — honest answers
Guides
Dating & LinkedIn photo tips
Blog
Looksmaxxing articles
Celebrity Scores
How famous faces rank
Free Widget Embed
Add face analysis to your site
About
Our mission & team
PrettyScale gives you one number and nothing else. If you want to know why you scored that way and what to actually change, these alternatives are better.
Why people switch from PrettyScale
The most common complaint: PrettyScale gives different scores to the same photo on repeat visits, and never explains what's being measured or how to improve. A score from 0–100 with no context isn't useful.
PrettyScale is one of the oldest face rating tools online. It's free and fast, which is why millions of people use it. But it has two major problems:
RealSmile measures 17 distinct facial metrics — canthal tilt, facial width-to-height ratio, jawline angle, bilateral symmetry, hunter eye index, and more — using 68-point AI landmark detection that runs entirely in your browser. The same photo always produces the same result because it's measuring geometry, not generating a probabilistic score.
You see exactly which metrics are above or below average for your demographic, where you rank in the population, and a specific glow-up plan ranked by impact. It takes about 10 seconds.
Try it free -- 17 metrics · NIH-cited landmarks
17 metrics with explanations, no signup
| Feature | RealSmile | PrettyScale |
|---|---|---|
| Metrics measured | 17 facial metrics with percentile rankings | 1 overall attractiveness score |
| Result explanation | Explains each metric, why it matters, and how to improve | Single percentage with no explanation |
| Privacy | Photos processed in memory, deleted instantly — never stored | Photo uploaded to servers |
| Consistency | Same photo = same result every time | Users report varying scores on the same photo |
| Improvement advice | Ranked glow-up plan specific to your metrics | None |
| Speed | ~10 seconds | ~5 seconds |
| Signup | No account required | No account required |
| Cost | Free scan, $14.99 full report | Free |
Looksmax.ai
Full comparison →Looksmaxxing-focused tool with a 1–10 score and general tier labels (Giga-chad, Chad, etc.). Fun but less scientifically grounded than geometric measurement.
PrettyScale gives one overall attractiveness percentage with no explanation of how it was calculated. Users frequently report wildly different scores for the same photo on different attempts, which suggests the model isn't deterministic. Modern alternatives like RealSmile measure 17 specific geometric metrics (symmetry, canthal tilt, FWHR, golden ratio, jawline angle, etc.) so you can see exactly which proportions are pulling your score up or down. The math is reproducible — same photo, same result every time.
The model appears to incorporate a random seed or time-based element. Multiple users on Reddit and looksmaxxing forums have documented large score swings by uploading the identical image minutes apart. This makes the tool unreliable for tracking progress or comparing photos. Tools that use deterministic landmark detection (like RealSmile) eliminate this — every analysis runs the same 17 calculations against your facial geometry.
RealSmile is the closest free replacement: it runs entirely client-side (your photo is never stored), measures 17 facial metrics instead of one black-box score, gives you specific improvement guidance, and produces consistent results. Other options include Anaface (golden-ratio focused, simpler), Photofeeler (crowd-rated rather than AI), and looksmax.ai (subscription-based). For most people wanting "PrettyScale but better and free," RealSmile is the direct upgrade.
For diagnostic value, yes. PrettyScale tells you a single number and stops. RealSmile breaks your face down into 17 measurable components, ranks each against a peer-reviewed reference data, and tells you which ones are dragging your score down. You also get a free overall score in 10 seconds without an email. The tradeoff: RealSmile's premium report ($14.99) goes deeper than PrettyScale's free output, but the free tier already provides more insight than PrettyScale's paid version (which doesn't exist).
PrettyScale uploads your photo to their servers for processing — their privacy policy permits storing and using uploaded images. If privacy matters to you, prefer tools that run client-side. RealSmile never stores your photo: on desktop the scan runs in your browser (on-device AI), and on mobile your photo is processed in memory by our scan server and deleted immediately after the landmarks are measured — never written to disk and never used to train any model.
PrettyScale uses a single end-to-end attractiveness model that outputs a percentage without exposing intermediate features. Users have no insight into why their score is what it is, which makes the result useless for self-improvement. Modern facial analysis tools have moved to landmark-based, multi-metric breakdowns precisely so users can see what to work on. If you want a score that actually helps you, pick a tool that shows the math.
PrettyScale is safe in the sense that it isn't malware, but it does upload your face photo to their servers and stores it under their privacy terms. For most casual users that's acceptable; for anyone concerned about face data ending up in training datasets or future breaches, an on-device tool is the safer pick. RealSmile and a handful of other modern tools have moved to fully client-side analysis specifically to avoid this.
Free · No signup · Photos never stored
17 facial metrics, percentile rankings, and a specific glow-up plan -- in 10 seconds.
17 metrics · NIH-cited landmarks -- try free now
Get My Free Score →