The chad framing decomposed into jaw, canthal tilt, midface ratio, cheekbone projection, and symmetry. Measurement framing only, no tier labels on the report.
Five of the 17 metrics map directly. Continuous percentile bands instead of discrete tier categories.
17 metrics · Free · No signup
Free score · $14.99 unlocks per-metric percentile bands
Strip the slang and the chad face framing concatenates five findings from the perception research literature into a single visual archetype. Jaw definition correlates with perceived masculinity and dominance (Carre and McCormick 2008 on fWHR; Stirrat and Perrett 2010 on perceived dominance). Positive canthal tilt correlates with perceived attractiveness across multiple reference distributions (Naini and Gill 2017). Facial symmetry correlates with perceived health and attractiveness (Little Jones DeBruine 2011 meta-analysis on n=4,500). Short midface ratios read as forward-grown and youthful in adults. High cheekbone projection reads as masculine in men and youthful in both sexes.
The scan returns your percentile on each of those five against a male reference distribution. The composite combines them with the broader 12 metrics that round out a full facial profile. The framing is a measurement vocabulary, not a verdict.
Lower jaw angle off horizontal in left-profile photos. Flatter angles read as more chad-coded; steeper angles read as long lower third. Mostly fixed in adults outside of orthognathic surgery.
Sharpness and angularity of the mandibular border. Highest-loading single chad input. Soft-tissue contribution from body fat percentage is meaningful; the bony angle underneath is fixed.
Outer-to-inner-corner eye axis angle. Positive tilt (above neutral horizontal) reads as alert, masculine, and youthful. Naini and Gill 2017 documented attractiveness correlations.
Vertical proportion of the middle third of the face. Short midfaces (compact forehead-to-nose-base relative to nose-base-to-chin) read as forward-grown and chad-coded. Fixed in adults.
Forward and outward extension of the zygomatic bones. High projection reads as chad in men and youthful in both sexes. Fixed without surgical intervention or filler.
Right-vs-left face deviation. Chad-tier faces cluster within roughly 3 percent landmark deviation. Modifiable component is mostly soft-tissue and facial expression; the bony asymmetry underneath is fixed.
Tier vocabulary (chad, chadlite, mogger, high-tier-normie) flattens a continuous distribution into discrete categories and invites comparison spirals. The same face can read as chadlite on Tuesday and high-tier-normie on Wednesday depending on lighting and angle. That instability is a feature of the labels, not your face.
Continuous percentile reporting is steadier and more actionable. A composite of percentile 78 against the male reference distribution is a real number. It does not move week to week. The two weakest metrics on the report give you a concrete intervention list. The two strongest tell you what is already working. Measurement framing converts the chad question into a triage exercise.
See which five metrics actually decide the chad framing on your face.
The $14.99 Looksmax Report tags every metric as structural or soft-tissue, names the two dragging your composite, and prescribes an intervention plan ordered by expected impact.
Free, instant, private. 17 metrics with percentile bands against a male reference distribution.
17 metrics · Photos auto-deleted · Rescan as often as you want
All free. All private. All instant.
Is your smile genuine or forced?
How close are your proportions to φ?
AI attractiveness analysis
Rate my face 1–10
How attractive am I?
How symmetrical is your face?
Which photo gets more matches?
Best photo for LinkedIn
Your glow-up score
Hand-picked from 90+ tests, guides, and audits.