Where your face actually lands on the mogger spectrum. Structural slab plus soft-tissue presentation, scored on the same 17-metric grid the forums argue about.
Percentile bands instead of tier labels. Modifiable metrics flagged separately from fixed structural ones.
17 metrics · Free · No signup
Free score · $14.99 unlocks structural vs soft-tissue breakdown
The looksmax community uses an informal tier ladder that originated on the lookism forum around 2015 and migrated through PSL, Lookism.cz, looksmax.org, and eventually TikTok. The tiers (subhuman, low-tier normie, normie, high-tier normie, chadlite, chad, mythical-chad) have no formal scoring system behind them. They are pattern-matched against celebrity reference faces and argued over post by post.
What the scan does is reduce the structural inputs the forums actually point at (jawline angle, midface ratio, cheekbone projection, canthal tilt, intercanthal distance, mandibular plane angle, lower-third proportion) into a single percentile against a 50,000-photo reference distribution. The composite is continuous, so the report shows where you fall as a percentile band rather than slotting you into a discrete tier.
In practice, percentile 95 and above maps to the mogger label as forums use it. Percentile 85 to 95 is the chadlite range. Percentile 60 to 85 is high-tier normie. Below 60 is the bulk of the population. None of these labels are diagnostic; they are vocabulary the community uses.
Sharpness and angularity of the mandibular border in straight-on and three-quarter photos. The single highest-loading structural input to the mogger composite for men.
Forward and outward extension of the zygomatic bones. High projection registers as masculine in men and youthful in both sexes.
Vertical proportion of the middle third. Compact midfaces (short forehead-to-nose-base distance relative to nose-base-to-chin) read as forward-grown and rank higher on the mogger scale.
Outer-to-inner-corner eye axis angle. Positive tilt is one of the strongest visual mogger markers; it appears in nearly every face the community labels mogger or higher.
Inner-eye-corner spacing relative to face width. Average to slightly narrower spacing reads as stronger; extreme spacing in either direction lowers the composite.
Lower jaw angle off horizontal in a left-profile photo. Flatter angles (closer to horizontal) read as more mogger; steeper angles read as long lower third.
The biggest mistake on looksmax forums is treating the mogger label as a single number you grind toward. In reality the composite has two distinct slabs. The structural slab (jaw angle, midface ratio, cheekbone projection, canthal tilt) is largely fixed in adults. Outside of orthognathic surgery or implants, you cannot move it more than a percentile or two.
The soft-tissue slab (body fat percentage, lip seal, skin texture, posture, hairstyle framing, expression) is meaningfully modifiable. Most people can shift this slab by 10 to 15 percentile points in 90 days with a coordinated effort. The report tags every metric as structural or soft-tissue so you know which two are realistic to target.
Find out which metrics actually move. Skip the ones that do not.
The $14.99 Looksmax Report tags every one of the 17 metrics as fixed or modifiable, names the two dragging your composite, and prescribes a soft-tissue plan ranked by expected impact.
Free, instant, private. 17 metrics with percentile bands against a 50,000-photo reference distribution.
17 metrics · Photos auto-deleted · Rescan as often as you want
All free. All private. All instant.
Is your smile genuine or forced?
How close are your proportions to φ?
AI attractiveness analysis
Rate my face 1–10
How attractive am I?
How symmetrical is your face?
Which photo gets more matches?
Best photo for LinkedIn
Your glow-up score
Hand-picked from 90+ tests, guides, and audits.