For overall facial geometry
Start free
See your overall score + the 2 metrics dragging your face down. Instant. No signup.
Run free scan →Recommended
Every metric scored, percentile-ranked against the population, with a 30-day glow-up plan. Instant PDF unlock.
Unlock full report · $14.99 →Or full report
Human-grade written report. Use it for LinkedIn, dating, or anywhere a written analysis beats raw metrics.
Go Pro · $149 →Not sure?
3 quick questions → we recommend the right product for your goal, timeframe, and budget.
Start the quiz →The variables that consistently move face-rater scores on the same face — lighting, framing, expression, grooming.
Most "looksmax" advice mixes plausible portrait technique with bone-structure mythology. This guide separates the two: nine variables that perception research and standard portrait practice agree do move scores on the same face — and the ones that don't.
Most people jump straight into looksmaxxing without a stable baseline. Face-rater tools use different training sets and weighting schemes (Buolamwini & Gebru 2018 documented how much demographic skew alone shifts outputs), so a single score on a single day says very little.
The fix: use the same tool, the same lighting, and roughly the same time of day across multiple sessions. The RealSmile looksmaxxing test scores facial axes anchored to anthropometric measurements (Farkas 1994) and the perception literature on symmetry and averageness (Rhodes 2006; Langlois & Roggman 1990) rather than a single proprietary "beauty score."
Document the conditions, not just the number: lighting, expression, distance, time of day. The same face can read noticeably different across those conditions, and that variance is what you're trying to control out. For a fixed reference you can re-rate against later, our premium photo critique with PDF returns the same axes from one upload.
Pro tip
Take your baseline photo at roughly arm's length with natural window light hitting your face from the side at about a 45-degree angle — this mirrors how people see you indoors during the day.
Skin condition is one of the strongest perceptual cues for health and age (Fink, Grammer & Matts; Jones et al.), and most face-rater models pick up texture differences directly. Skin quality is also the easiest variable to fix in weeks rather than months, which makes it the right place to start.
A boring routine beats an aggressive one. CeRAVE Foaming Facial Cleanser is a standard non-stripping cleanser; The Ordinary Niacinamide 10% + Zinc 1% is widely cited for sebum and pore appearance. Use them consistently before adding actives. Avoid stacking five new products at once — you can't isolate what's working and you risk barrier damage that hurts photographs.
Track progress with close-up photos in identical lighting every few days. Texture changes appear gradually as the skin's renewal cycle plays out (typically several weeks); don't expect overnight changes from a cleanser.
The fix
Apply leave-on products on slightly damp skin — humectants like niacinamide and hyaluronic acid bind better when there's water on the surface.
📊
AI analyzes your face across 14+ metrics — symmetry, jawline, ratios, skin quality, and more.
Take the Looksmaxxing Test Free →Free · No signup · Instant results · 17 metrics · NIH-cited landmarks
Lower-face width and jaw definition show up consistently as masculinity/attractiveness signals in the perception literature (Carre & McCormick 2008; Geniole et al. 2015). What that does not mean: jaw exercises will reshape adult bone. They won't. Real visible gains in the lower face come from two places — reduced subcutaneous facial fat, and masseter tone for definition along the gonial angle.
Softmaxxing the jawline starts with the obvious: lower-sodium meals, less alcohol, and adequate sleep — all reduce day-to-day facial puffiness. For muscle work, mastic gum is a denser chew than regular gum and is commonly used for masseter loading; if you have any TMJ history, skip it.
Chew in moderation, alternating sides. The risk with any jaw-loading device is overuse — masseter overgrowth makes the lower face look wider, not sharper, which is the opposite of what most people want. Treat it like calf raises, not a daily marathon.
Research says
Skeletal muscle responds to resistance loading in the order of weeks; visible facial muscle hypertrophy follows the same timeline.
Facial hair is high-variance: a defined beard can read as more masculine, while an unkempt one reads as careless grooming — the same person, same face. Whichever direction you go, what raters notice is the edge, not the bulk. Sharp lines look intentional; soft, fuzzy boundaries look like you forgot.
For a clean shave, work after a warm shower and pair a multi-blade razor with single-blade detail tools (Tinkle-style razors are common) for the cheek line, neck transition, and the strip just below the lower lip. Those three boundaries do most of the visual work.
If you're keeping facial hair, the rule of thumb most barbers teach: drop the neckline to roughly two fingers above the Adam's apple, follow the natural jaw curve, and keep the cheek line a touch below where it grows in naturally — not painted-on straight.
Quick win
Shave immediately after a warm shower — softer hair and warm skin reduce drag and irritation.
Face-rater models score the proportions in front of them. Your camera angle and focal length decide what those proportions are. Short-focal-length lenses held close to the face exaggerate features near the camera (the nose) and shrink the rest — the well-known "selfie distortion" portrait photographers warn about.
The universal rule: camera at eye level or very slightly above, never significantly below. Low angles widen the lower face and exaggerate the nose; slight elevation flatters most face shapes. This is consistent with what photographers have taught for decades and with how your face is anthropometrically measured (Farkas 1994) versus how it appears under lens distortion.
Distance matters as much as angle. The further you move the camera (within reason), the closer the rendering gets to true facial proportions. Use a self-timer and step back, or use a longer focal length if your phone has a portrait/2x lens — both reduce wide-angle distortion in the same way.
Pro tip
If your phone has it, prefer the secondary "portrait" or "2x" lens over the wide selfie cam — the longer focal length renders proportions closer to how people see you in person.
Expression matters more than most people guess. The Duchenne smile — the one Ekman characterized as engaging both the zygomaticus major (lips) and the orbicularis oculi (eyes) — reads as genuine; a posed lips-only smile reads as performative (Frank, Ekman & Friesen 1993). Most face-rater models implicitly weight expression because it's encoded all over the image: cheek shape, eye aperture, lip curvature.
The cheap trick: think of something genuinely amusing for a beat before the shutter, then let the smile fade naturally — real Duchenne activity is hard to fake on cue, but easy to summon with the right mental image. Avoid the held "say cheese" smile that only moves the lips.
For eye contact, look at the camera lens itself, not at the screen preview. People reading photographs are sensitive to even slight gaze deviation; direct gaze is consistently rated as more engaging and trustworthy (Mason, Tatkow & Macrae 2005). A small mark next to the lens helps you anchor your gaze.
The data
Direct gaze and Duchenne smiles are two of the best-replicated cues to perceived warmth and approachability in face perception research (Todorov & Porter 2014).
The same face photographs differently across the day. Sleep position, hydration, sodium intake, and lymphatic drainage all change facial fluid distribution — overnight you tend to gather fluid (puffiness), and as you stand and move it redistributes. Most people look puffiest immediately after waking and most defined a few hours later.
A practical window: late morning to early afternoon, once you've been upright for a few hours, hydrated normally, and before any heavy meal. Skip photos right after waking, right after a salty meal, or after alcohol — all amplify facial fluid retention.
Hydration helps, but more water is not better. The goal is steady hydration through the day, not chugging right before photos — over-hydration shows up as puffiness, especially around the eyes.
Try this
A few minutes of light upward face massage from jaw to temples is a standard pre-shoot trick — it doesn't change bone, but it does briefly reduce surface puffiness.
Most looksmaxxing fails because people try everything at once, can't tell what's working, and quit when scores don't move overnight. The fix is to change one variable at a time and track it. A reasonable rollout: Week 1 skin routine; Week 2 add masseter work and dietary cleanup; Week 3 add lighting, framing and angle drills; Week 4 combine.
Track weekly under the same conditions: same time of day, same window, same focal length, same expression. Without that, you're measuring noise. Note which week's change actually moved the score — most do nothing, a few do most of the work, and the goal is figuring out which.
The psychological component matters: scoring yourself daily fuels obsession (Phillips et al. on body dysmorphic patterns) without giving you any new information. Weekly check-ins are enough to see real signal.
Key insight
Take photos every few days, but only score weekly — high-frequency self-rating tends to amplify perceived flaws rather than reveal real change.
The looksmaxxing market loves expensive supplements and gadgets. Most of them don't move the needle. The variables that actually shift face-rater scores on the same face — lighting, framing, expression, skin condition, grooming, lower-face fluid — are mostly free or close to it.
A reasonable starter stack: a non-stripping cleanser (CeRAVE), niacinamide for pore appearance (The Ordinary), a mastic-style gum for moderate masseter loading, and detail razors (Tinkle-style) for boundary work. Real product prices vary by retailer; we link directly so you see current pricing rather than relying on numbers that drift in this article.
Skip the expensive single-purpose gadgets (jaw exercisers with cult marketing, "miracle" serums) until the basics are dialed in. Most people see meaningful change in skin and grooming within a few weeks, while structural perceptions (jaw definition through reduced fluid and modest masseter tone) take longer.
Quick win
If you're going to fix one thing first, fix camera height and focal length — it costs nothing and works on day one.
Looksmaxxing Test
AI looksmax score & metrics
AI Face Rating
Rate your face 1-10 instantly
Face Score
Expression, symmetry & smile analysis
Symmetry Test
Bilateral symmetry analysis
Curated based on looksmaxxing research. Affiliate links — we may earn a small commission.
AI measures canthal tilt, FWHR, jawline, hunter eyes, and more.
Take the Looksmaxxing Test →Skin and photo-technique changes show up first — usually within a couple of weeks of consistent application. Larger perceptual changes that depend on muscle tone, lower-face fluid reduction, and grooming compounding tend to take roughly 4-8 weeks of consistent work.
No face-rater is "ground truth" — they're trained on different datasets and weight different cues (Buolamwini & Gebru 2018 documented how much demographic skew alone shifts outputs). The trick is to fix the tool and the conditions and watch the delta over time rather than chase a specific number. Tools that grade everyone high are tuned for engagement, not signal.
Jaw exercises load the masseter, which can add definition along the gonial angle in the same way calf raises tone the lower leg. They will not change adult bone. The larger visible difference for most people comes from reducing facial fluid retention (sodium, alcohol, sleep) over a few weeks. Be careful with overuse — masseter overgrowth can widen rather than sharpen the lower face.
Softmaxxing covers reversible variables: skincare, grooming, photography (lighting, angle, focal length), expression, and modest muscle toning. Hardmaxxing covers surgical or skeletal changes (orthognathic surgery, rhinoplasty, etc.). For almost everyone, softmaxxing is where the meaningful gains are — most people undershoot how much score variance is photographic and grooming-driven on the same face.
Affiliate disclosure: This post contains affiliate links. If you purchase through them, we earn a small commission at no additional cost to you. We only recommend products based on facial analysis research. YOUR DATA IS NEVER COLLECTED — privacy is our #1 priority.
Get weekly looksmaxxing tips by email
Jawline exercises, skin routines, and metrics — one tip per week, free.
Hand-picked from 90+ tests, guides, and audits.
Quiz-format attractiveness scoring
LooksmaxHonest AI verdict in 30 seconds
LooksmaxGet your decile rank in 30 seconds
LooksmaxHonest AI verdict in 30 seconds
LooksmaxNo-fluff score with grounding science
LooksmaxPeer-reviewed scoring methodology
For overall facial geometry
Start free
See your overall score + the 2 metrics dragging your face down. Instant. No signup.
Run free scan →Recommended
Every metric scored, percentile-ranked against the population, with a 30-day glow-up plan. Instant PDF unlock.
Unlock full report · $14.99 →Or full report
Human-grade written report. Use it for LinkedIn, dating, or anywhere a written analysis beats raw metrics.
Go Pro · $149 →Not sure?
3 quick questions → we recommend the right product for your goal, timeframe, and budget.
Start the quiz →Done reading? Get your photos audited
Upload up to 6 photos. Get a 5-page PDF: which photo to lead with, which to cut, and the exact fixes for your weakest metrics. Delivered in 24h.
Or try the free 17-metric scan first · free face score
Built RealSmile after testing every face analysis tool and finding most give fake scores with no methodology. Background in computer vision and TensorFlow.js. Has analyzed peer-reviewed reference data and published open research data on facial metrics.